The 2nd-oldest Known Myrmicine Ant

Among the 20 or so insects represented in the Green River Formation (GRF) fossils that I currently have on loan, this rather obvious ant (family Formicidae) is the only one that is firmly assignable to the order Hymenoptera (wasps, bees and ants). This is not surprising, as hymenopterans are not well represented among GRF insect fossils. In fact, of the 300+ insect species that have been described from GRF deposits (Wilson 1978), more than two-thirds belong to just three orders—Diptera (flies), Coleoptera (beetles) and Hemiptera (true bugs). Hymenoptera, on the other hand, comprise only 4% of GRF fossils (Dlussky & Rasnitsyn 2002). I presume these numbers are more a result of taphonomic (fossil formation) bias than a true reflection of insect diversity in western North America during the Middle Eocene (47–52 mya).

cf. Myrmecites rotundiceps | fossil impression from the Green River Formation (45 mya, middle Eocene)

cf. Myrmecites rotundiceps (length = 6.7 mm).

Ants in particular have been poorly represented by GRF deposits. Only four named species were known until Dlussky & Rasnitsyn (2002) reviewed available GRF fossils and increased the number to 18 (15 described as new, one older name placed in synonymy). Diagnoses, line drawings, and keys to all covered subfamilies, genera and species provide one of the best treatments to GRF insect fossils that I’ve come across. According to that work, the fossil in these photos seems comparable to the description and illustration given for Myrmecites rotundiceps, a unique fossil with the general appearance of ants in the subfamily Myrmicinae but differing from all known Eocene and New World fossil ants by its very short, two-segmented waist. The only difference I noted was size—6.7 mm length for my fossil versus 5.5 mm for the holotype (see figure below). Of course, I’m more comfortable identifying extant Coleoptera than extinct Formicidae, so I contacted senior author Gennady M. Dlussky to see if he agreed with my opinion. He graciously sent the following reply:

I agree that specimen on your photo is very similar to Myrmecites rotundiceps. It is larger (holotype is 5.5 mm long), but it may be normal variability. I cannot see another differences.

Myrmecites rotundiceps, holotype (Gennady & Rasnitsyn 2002)

Myrmecites rotundiceps Gennady & Rasnitsyn 2002, holotype (reproduced from Gennady & Rasnitysyn 2002)

If correctly assigned, M. rotundiceps is the second oldest known member of the subfamily Myrmicinae—the oldest being Eocenidris crassa from Middle Eocene Arkansas amber (45 mya). In fact, the only older ant fossil of any kind in North America is Formicium barryi (Carpenter) from Early Eocene deposits in Tennessee (wing only). [Edit: this is actually the only older Paleocene ant fossil—there are some Cretaceous-aged fossils such as Sphecomyrma freyi (thanks James Trager).] Since myrmicine fossils of comparable age are lacking from other parts of the world, this might suggest a North American origin for the subfamily; however, it could also be an artifact of incomplete knowledge of ants from older deposits in other parts of the world. Myrmicine ants make their first Eurasian appearance in Late Eocene Baltic amber deposits (40 mya) and become more numerous in North America during the early Oligocene (Florissant shales of Colorado, 33 mya). (Dlussky & Rasnitsyn (2002) consider the Middle–Late Eocene ant fauna to represent the beginnings of the modern ant fauna, with extant genera becoming numerous and extinct genera waning but still differing by the preponderance of species in the subfamily Dolichoderinae over Formicinae and Myrmicinae.

IMG_1919_enh_1080x720

USA: Colorado, Rio Blanco Co., Parachute Creek Member.

The photo above shows the entire fossil-bearing rock (also bearing the putative orthopteran posted earlier).

My thanks to Gennady Dlussky and James Trager for offering their opinions on the possible identity of this fossil.

REFERENCES:

Dlussky, G. M. & A. P. Rasnitsyn. 2002. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Formation Green River and some other Middle Eocene deposits of North America. Russian Entomological Journal 11(4):411–436.

Wilson, M. V. H. 1978. Paleogene insect faunas of western North America. Quaestiones Entomologicae 14(1):13–34.

Copyright © Ted C. MacRae 2012

About these ads

About Ted C. MacRae

Ted C. MacRae is a research entomologist by vocation and beetle taxonomist by avocation. Areas of expertise in the latter include worldwide jewel beetles (Buprestidae) and North American longhorned beetles (Cerambycidae). More recent work has focused on North American tiger beetles (Cicindelidae) and their distribution, ecology, and conservation.
This entry was posted in Formicidae, Hymenoptera and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to The 2nd-oldest Known Myrmicine Ant

  1. Stephen Thorpe says:

    There is confusion here: Mymecites and Myrmeciites‎ are two completely different ant genera, and Myrmeciinae and Myrmicinae are two completely different ant subfamilies. There is no Mymecinae!

    • If your confusion is over my mispelling of Myrmicinae as “Myrmecinae”, that has been corrected. However, it’s hard to understand why that should be so confusing, as even the folks at AntWeb have made this very common mistake.

      I do not understand your references to Mymecites, Myrmeciites, Myrmeciinae or Mymecinae—I didn’t mention any of these in my post.

  2. Very interesting that the ant and the “termite” were captured in time in the same piece of rock! Seeing the fossil in a larger context, I’m reconsidering my earlier “termite” determination (why would a termite be in such close proximity to an ant, presumably out in the open?), and considering whether it may be an orthop (as you and several others have put forward), possibly something myrmecophilous? Incredible window into a past ecosystem either way, and one hell of a paleo-entomological advent puzzle for all of us! Thanks for sharing the process!

    • Hi Morgan – excellent observation. Context was the reason I started including the photos of the complete fossil alongside the close-ups. I’m not sure we can assume evidence of myrmecophily—I think it’s more likely that they ended up near each other under shallow waters by chance. However, they certainly had to have occurred in the same habitat at the same time.

      I hope there are some paleoecologists that read this blog!

  3. James C. Trager says:

    Your Myrmecites fossil is a gyne (queen), so her being up and about with the other critter (dealated Zootermopsis-like termite sexual?) indicates having recently flown and fallen into that shallow water. Bodies of water are good places to look for extant ant species right after their flights, too.

    Regarding this comment “In fact, the only older ant fossil of any kind in North America is Formicium barryi (Carpenter) from Early Eocene deposits in Tennessee (wing only).” — Two words: Sphecomyrma freyi.

  4. The location where Myrmecites rotundiceps was located – Rio Blanco County, Colo. – is not far from Parachute, Colo., which is home of one of the largest oil shale deposits in North America, if not the world. I would imagine that there are many more intriguing fossils as yet undiscovered in this region.

    • Some of the other fossils I have were collected along Parachute Creek.

      It’s too bad that there aren’t more specialists around that are capable of studying all of the available material.

      • I lived in Garfield County, Colo., which Parachute Creek runs through, for a couple of years as a kid and it is indeed remote.

        I suppose studying the fossilized remains of insects doesn’t have the same lure as finding dinosaur remains, which is may be why there aren’t as many specialists. But that’s just my presumption.

Commentaria

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s